On 09/23/2013 10:38 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > >>> and heavily caveated. >> I'm not sure what caveats would be needed. It seems to me that a >> clear description of what it does would suffice. Like all the >> other non-default opclasses in core, it will be non-default because >> it is less frequently useful. > "This will claim things are different, even when they aren't different > when cast to text, or possibly even when extracted in binary mode, > ensure this is really what you want" is a pretty big caveat, imv. Yes, it should be documented that it tests for sameness and gives no guarantees that lack of sameness means "different" (as determined by some other operator)
-- Hannu Krosing PostgreSQL Consultant Performance, Scalability and High Availability 2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
