David Rowley escribió: > I do see a 15-18% slow down with the patched version, so perhaps I'll need > to look to see if I can speed it up a bit, although I do feel this > benchmark is not quite a normal workload.
Ouch. That's certainly way too much. Is the compiler inlining process_log_prefix_padding()? If not, does it do it if you add "inline" to it? That might speed up things a bit. If that's not enough, maybe you need some way to return to the original coding for the case where no padding is set in front of each option. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
