On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Agreed. The "wait free LW_SHARED" thing[1] I posted recently had a simple > > #define pg_atomic_read(atomic) (*(volatile uint32 *)&(atomic)) > > That should be sufficient and easily greppable, right?
Looks good enough for me. I would consider using a naming scheme that accounts for possible future uint64 atomics. Regards, Ants Aasma -- Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
