On 2013-10-02 13:16:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Each patch applied with its parents compiles, has no warnings AFAIK > and passes regression/isolation tests. Working on 0004 by the end of > the CF seems out of the way IMO, so I'd suggest focusing on 0002 and > 0003 now, and I can put some time to finalize them for this CF. I > think that we should perhaps split 0003 into 2 pieces, with one patch > for the introduction of index_concurrent_build, and another for > index_concurrent_set_dead. Comments are welcome about that though, and > if people agree on that I'll do it once 0002 is finalized.
FWIW I don't think splitting of index_concurrent_build is worthwile... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
