On 2013-10-15 10:19:06 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 10/15/2013 05:52 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > But the argument about being friendly for new users should definitely > > have us change wal_level and max_wal_senders. > > +1 for having replication supported out-of-the-box aside from pg_hba.conf. > > To put it another way: users are more likely to care about replication > than they are about IO overhead on a non-replicated server. And for the > users who care about IO overhead, they are more likely to much about in > pg.conf *anyway* in order to set a slew of performance-tuning settings.
But it will hurt people restoring backups using pg_restore -j. I think people might be rather dissapointed if that slows down by a factor of three. I think we really need to get to the point where we increase the wal level ondemand... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
