On 09/30/2013 01:47 PM, Vik Fearing wrote: > Yes, I understand you are trying to help, and I appreciate it! My > opinion, and that of others as well from the original thread, is that > this patch should either go in as is and break that one case, or not go > in at all. I'm fine with either (although clearly I would prefer it > went in otherwise I wouldn't have written the patch).
I see this is marked as rejected in the commitfest app, but I don't see any note about who did it or why. I don't believe there is consensus for rejection on this list. In fact I think the opposite is true. May we have an explanation please from the person who rejected this without comment? -- Vik -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
