On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > The last bucket would be limited to 8ms < x <= 16 ms. If you find something >> 16ms, then you have to rescale *before* you increment any of the buckets. > Once you do, there is now room to hold it.
How is that laid out in shared memory? If the answer is an array of 32 int64s, one per bucket, -1 from me to this proposal. A huge advantage of pg_stat_statements today is that the overhead is actually fairly modest. I really want to preserve that property. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
