On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > So you're suggesting that instead of storing the aggregates as we > currently do, we store a buffer of the last N queries (in normal form) > and their stats? And then aggregate when the user asks for it?
No, I'm not. I'm suggesting storing the query texts externally, in a file. They usually use 1024 bytes of shared memory per entry, regardless of how long the query text is. This would allow pg_stat_statements to store arbitrarily large query texts, while also giving us breathing room if we have ambitions around expanding what pg_stat_statements can (optionally) track. Having said that, I am still pretty sensitive to bloating pg_stat_statements. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
