Robert Haas escribió: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:51 AM, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've attached a re-based version of this. > > I don't see any compelling reason not to commit this. Does anyone > wish to object?
I think a blanket substitution of places that currently have %s might cause bugs, particularly if the string is user-supplied. It might be right for many cases, but did you/someone review each such callsite? No objection to the other half, that substitute calls that don't have %s. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
