On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Really I'd like to see standalone mode, in its current form, go away >>> completely. I had a prototype patch for allowing psql and other clients >>> to interface to a standalone backend. I think getting that finished would >>> be a way more productive use of time than improving debugtup. > >> The last patch including Windows implementation was posted at below >> link sometime back. >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6C0B27F7206C9E4CA54AE035729E9C382853263C@szxeml509-mbs > >> If this is the right thing, I can rebase the patch and make it ready. > > IIRC, the discussion stalled out because people had security concerns > and/or there wasn't consensus about how it should look at the user level. > There's probably not much point in polishing a patch until we have more > agreement about the high-level design.
Okay. However +1 for working on that idea as lot of people have shown interest in it. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
