On 11/07/2013 02:27 PM, Jan Lentfer wrote:
Btw, how hard would it be, to have pg_restore and now also pg_dump run with -j option do some ordering of work by size of e.g. the tables? E.g. if you run with -j4 it would make sense to start working on the largest tables (and it's indexes) first and continue by descending in t´size to keep all available "slots" filled as good as possible. Just at though.
Please start another thread on this - it's really completely separate from the issue at hand. Hijacking threads like this is not a good idea.
cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
