On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com > wrote > > I think that means that we should just completely replace the list with > the hash table. The difference with a small N is lost in noise, so there's > no point in keeping the list as a fast path for small N. That'll make the > patch somewhat simpler. > - Heikki >
Attached is a much more simple patch which gets rid of the initial linked list.
hashtab_seq_v0.2.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
