On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp > wrote:
> > I think that, as a secondary effect of the patch, the scan would be > performed a bit efficiently. > > Hi Etsuro, Would you be able to supply some benchmarks of a work load which benefits from this change? Something which compares patched and unpatched versions of head would be really good. Regards David Rowley > I'll add the patch to the 2013-11 CF. Any comments are welcome. > > Thanks, > > Best regards, > Etsuro Fujita > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
