Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> So I committed this patch without backpatching anything. ...
> ... should we wait longer for the new renegotiation code to
> be more battle-tested?
+1 to waiting awhile. I think if we don't see any problems in
HEAD, then back-patching as-is would be the best solution.
The other alternatives are essentially acknowledging that you're
back-patching something you're afraid isn't production ready.
Let's not go there.
Another reason I'm not in a hurry is that the problem we're trying
to solve doesn't seem to be causing real-world trouble. So by
"awhile", I'm thinking "let's let it get through 9.4 beta testing".
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
