On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > +1. If changing at all, then maybe just "autovacuum_mem"?
I would like to stick with autovacuum_work_mem - it reflects the fact that it's a setting shadowed by maintenance_work_mem, without being too verbose. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
