On 2013-11-18 10:58:26 -0800, Christophe Pettus wrote: > After promotion, it was discovered that there was significant data > loss on S1. Rows that were present on P1 were missing on S1, and some > rows were duplicated (including duplicates that violated primary key > and other unique constraints). The indexes were corrupt, in that they > seemed to think that the duplicates were not duplicated, and that the > missing rows were still present.
Were there any kind of patterns in the lost data? What kind of workload are they running? I have an idea what the issue might be... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
