On 2013-11-19 09:51:28 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 11/19/2013 06:20 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2013-11-18 23:15:59 +0100, Andres Freund wrote: > >> Afaics it's likely a combination/interaction of bugs and fixes between: > >> * the initial HS code > >> * 5a031a5556ff83b8a9646892715d7fef415b83c3 > >> * f44eedc3f0f347a856eea8590730769125964597 > > > > Yes, the combination of those is guilty. > > > > Man, this is (to a good part my) bad. > > > >> But that'd mean nobody noticed it during 9.3's beta... > > Ah, so this affected 9.3.0 as well?
Yes. > Maybe it's worth it now to devise some automated replication testing? It'd be a good idea, but I am not sure where to get resources for it from. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
