On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello > <fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The main goal of this patch is enable to an user the capability to store > > options > > (relations and attributes) related to extensions by using a fixed prefix > > called 'ext' in > > the defined name. It's cant be useful for replication solutions. > > > > So, with this patch we can do that: > > > > ALTER TABLE foo > > SET (ext.somext.do_replicate=true); > > > > When 'ext' is the fixed prefix, 'somext' is the extension name, > > 'do_replicate' is the > > extension option and 'true' is the value. > > This doesn't seem like a particular good choice of syntax;
What's your syntax suggestion? > and I also have my doubts about the usefulness of the feature. > This feature can be used for replication solutions, but also can be used for any extension that need do some specific configuration about tables, attributes and/or indexes. Regards, -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br >> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com >> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello