>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
Tom> [ I assume you forgot a create type footype here ] yeah, sorry Tom> Well, it's not insane on its face. The rowtype of f in the Tom> first example is necessarily a built-on-the-fly record, but in Tom> the second case using the properties of the underlying named Tom> composite type is possible, and consistent with what happens in Tom> 9.3 and earlier. (Not that I'm claiming we were or are totally Tom> consistent ...) Right, but your changes to the code make it look like there was an intended change there - with the scan type tupdesc being forced to RECORD type and its column names changed. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
