Josh Berkus <[email protected]> writes: > On 11/24/2013 06:42 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: >> I think we should be thinking harder about how to implement >> ASSERTIONs, possibly calling them ASSERTION TRIGGERs not pre-commit >> write event triggers.
> I don't know that anyone is working on this, though, or even plans to. Huh? http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected] It's far from committable, of course, but there is somebody working on it. I tend to agree with the complaints that pre-commit triggers in the proposed form would be pretty useless. You'd have to code in C to get any useful information about what the transaction had done (and you'd still not have much), but if you're coding in C there's already a hook you can use for this. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
