On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote: > This, along with the already-discussed "attempted to update invisible > tuple" forms a full account of unexpected ERRORs seen during the > extended run of the test case, so far.
Actually, it was slightly misleading of me to say it's the same test-case; in fact, this time I ran each pgbench run with a variable, random number of seconds between 2 and 20 inclusive (as opposed to always 2 seconds). If you happen to need help recreating this, I am happy to give it. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
