On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com > wrote:
> On 11/26/13 15:34, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > >> What's your plans about GIN now? I tried to rebase packed posting lists >> with head. But I found that you've changed interface of placeToPage >> function. That's conflicts with packed posting lists, because >> dataPlaceToPageLeaf needs not only offset number to describe place to >> insert item pointer. Do you like to commit rework of handling GIN >> incomplete splits before? >> > > Yeah, I'm planning to get back to this patch after committing the > incomplete splits patch. I think the refactoring of the WAL-logging that I > did in that patch will simplify this patch, too. I'll take a look at > Michael's latest comments on the incomplete splits patch tomorrow, so I > should get back to this on Thursday or Friday. Should I try to rebase this patch now or you plan to do it yourself? Some changes like "void *insertdata" argument make me think you have some particular plan to rebase this patch, but I didn't get it exactly. ------ With best regards, Alexander Korotkov.
