On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:45:51AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Xi Wang <xi.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > CHECK_STACK_DEPTH checks if errordata_stack_depth is negative. >> > Move the dereference of &errordata[errordata_stack_depth] after >> > the check to avoid out-of-bounds read. >> >> This seems sensible and I'm inclined to commit it. It's unlikely to >> matter very much in practice, since the only point of checking the >> stack depth in the first place is to catch a seemingly-unlikely coding >> error; and it's unlikely that referencing beyond the stack bounds >> would do anything too horrible, either. But we may as well do it >> right. > > Was this ever dealt with?
No, it fell through the cracks. I have just committed it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
