Mika Eloranta <m...@ohmu.fi> writes:
> On 02 Dec 2013, at 01:56, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> * any other items that need to be corrected or expanded?

> I think 2103430 (Fix parsing of xlog file name in pg_receivexlog) is worth 
> mentioning, 
> as all past pg_receivexlog 9.3.x versions fail to resume interrupted 
> streaming after ~4 GiB
> of xlogs have been generated.

OK, I'd misunderstood the severity of that problem.  Item added, thanks!

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to