Mika Eloranta <m...@ohmu.fi> writes: > On 02 Dec 2013, at 01:56, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> * any other items that need to be corrected or expanded?
> I think 2103430 (Fix parsing of xlog file name in pg_receivexlog) is worth > mentioning, > as all past pg_receivexlog 9.3.x versions fail to resume interrupted > streaming after ~4 GiB > of xlogs have been generated. OK, I'd misunderstood the severity of that problem. Item added, thanks! regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers