Hi Alvaro, Noah,
On 2013-12-03 15:57:10 +0100, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2013-12-03 09:48:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > > On 2013-12-03 00:47:07 -0500, Noah Misch wrote: > > >> The test spec additionally > > >> covers a (probably-related) assertion failure, new in 9.3.2. > > > > > Too bad it's too late to do anthing about it for 9.3.2. :(. At least the > > > last seems actually unrelated, I am not sure why it's 9.3.2 > > > only. Alvaro, are you looking? > > > > Is this bad enough that we need to re-wrap the release? > > Tentatively I'd say no, the only risk is loosing locks afaics. Thats > much bettter than corrupting rows as in 9.3.1. But I'll look into it in > a bit more detail as soon as I am of the phone call I am on. After looking, I think I am revising my opinion. The broken locking behaviour (outside of freeze, which I don't see how we can fix in time), is actually bad. Would that stop us from making the release date with packages? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
