On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Christian Kruse <christ...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi Fabrizio, >> >> looks good to me. I did some testing on 9.2.4, 9.2.5 and HEAD. It >> applies and compiles w/o errors or warnings. I set up a master and two >> hot standbys replicating from the master, one with 5 minutes delay and >> one without delay. After that I created a new database and generated >> some test data: >> >> CREATE TABLE test (val INTEGER); >> INSERT INTO test (val) (SELECT * FROM generate_series(0, 1000000)); >> >> The non-delayed standby nearly instantly had the data replicated, the >> delayed standby was replicated after exactly 5 minutes. I did not >> notice any problems, errors or warnings. >> > > Thanks for your review Christian...
So, I proposed this patch previously and I still think it's a good idea, but it got voted down on the grounds that it didn't deal with clock drift. I view that as insufficient reason to reject the feature, but others disagreed. Unless some of those people have changed their minds, I don't think this patch has much future here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
