On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Metin Doslu <me...@citusdata.com> wrote: >> From what I've seen so far the bigger problem than contention in the >> lwlocks itself, is the spinlock protecting the lwlocks... > > Postgres 9.3.1 also reports spindelay, it seems that there is no contention > on spinlocks.
Did you check hugepages? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
