Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes:
> And, for that matter, accepting this patch by no means blocks doing
> something more sophisticated in the future.
Yeah. I think the only real argument against it is "do we really need
yet another knob?". Since Josh, who's usually the voicer of that
argument, is for this one, I don't have a problem with it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
