Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2013-12-13 09:52:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think you're probably right: >> what should be in the interrupt handler is something like >> "if (ImmediateInterruptOK) CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();"
> Yea, that sounds right. Or just don't set process interrupts there, it > doesn't seem to be required for correctness? It is if we need to break out of a wait-for-lock ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers