On 12/16/2013 04:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: >> I've looked in the archives, but I can't find a reason why INSTEAD OF >> triggers were never enabled for tables. > > What would that mean exactly? And how would you do the actual update > when it came time to?
Well, I'm specifically thinking of master partition tables. In that case, we really want an INSTEAD OF trigger. It seems a little silly that I need to create a separate view, and then an INSTEAD OF trigger on the view, in order to get a rows-updated count back from an INSERT which hits a partitioned table. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
