On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 12/17/13, 10:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Perhaps we should just move all the Needs Review and RFC patches forward >> to the next fest, so we don't forget about them? > > This was done the last few times, but it has caused some controversy. > One problem was that a number of patches arrived in this commit fest > without either the author or the reviewers knowing about it, which > caused the already somewhat stale patch to become completely abandoned. > > I think what I'll do is send an email to each of the affected patch > threads describing the situation. But I'd like someone involved in the > patch, either author or reviewer, to make the final call about moving > the patch forward.
+1. And thanks for your work on this CommitFest. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
