On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Maciek Sakrejda <m.sakre...@gmail.com> wrote: >VACUUM FREEZE sets both vacuum_freeze_min_age and vacuum_freeze_table_age to >0, but only the former is documented. This patch notes that the other setting >is also affected. > (now with patch--sorry about that)
Your explanation and patch seems fine to me. Kindly submit your patch in Open CommitFest (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=21). With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
