On 2013-12-30 12:29:22 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > But even if that wasn't > true, I don't know why you feel the need to go on and on about buffer > locking like this months later. Are you trying to be provocative? Can > you *please* stop?
ERR? Peter? *You* quoted a statement of mine that only made sense in it's original context. And I *did* say that the point about buffer locking applied to the *past* version of the patch. Andres -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
