Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-01-02 21:21:15 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> I don't see any other realistic way to fix this, however, so maybe we
>> should just bite the bullet and do it anyway.
> We could remember the subtransaction a variable was created in and error
> out if it the creating subtransaction aborted and it's not a
> pass-by-value datum or similar.
That would still result in throwing an error, though, so it isn't likely
to make the OP happy. I was wondering if we could somehow arrange to not
release the subtransaction's AccessShareLock on the table, as long as it
was protecting toasted references someplace.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
