Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > The history here is that originally I was intending to have these > functions documented, and so the descriptions were made to match the > operator descriptions, so that we didn't get a failure on this test. > Later we decided not to document them as part of last release's > bike-shedding, but the function descriptions didn't get changed / removed.
Ah. I suppose there's no way to cross-check the state of the function's pg_description comment against whether it has SGML documentation :-( regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers