Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 08:15:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Why would we change the operational procedure of "run this script >> after pg_upgrade"? It just complicates life for users.
> If it is one command, why use a script? Just give them the command. Because it won't necessarily always be just one command. I don't think we need to complicate life for users (or even more, their scripts) by making them actually read what pg_upgrade prints there. The point of Peter's proposal is that the multi-step-database-analyze process might be useful outside the context of pg_upgrade, so it's worth extracting that as a utility. It doesn't follow that we need to change the way users *of pg_upgrade itself* invoke the process. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers