On 1/12/14, 5:33 PM, I wrote:
On 1/9/14, 11:41 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
There are two basic questions:

b) will we support same API still - a reference on plugin_info in exec
state is a issue - described in patch.

Pardon my ignorance, but why does the plugin_info have to be in the
executor state?  If we're going to change the API, can't we pass it
directly to the callback function?

Oh, I think I'm being stupid -- we'd only have to do what *if* we don't want to change the API? Then my vote is for breaking the API.


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to