On 08-11-2013 06:20, Dilip kumar wrote: > On 08 November 2013 13:38, Jan Lentfer > > >> For this use case, would it make sense to queue work (tables) in order of >> their size, starting on the largest one? > >> For the case where you have tables of varying size this would lead to a >> reduced overall processing time as it prevents large (read: long processing >> time) tables to be processed in the last step. While processing large tables >> at first and filling up "processing slots/jobs" when they get free with >> smaller tables one after the other would safe overall execution time. > Good point, I have made the change and attached the modified patch. > Don't you submit it for a CF, do you? Is it too late for this CF?
-- Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
