I wrote: > Meh. This isn't needed if we do what I suggest above, but in any case > I don't approve of removing the existing [U]INT64_FORMAT macros. > That breaks code that doesn't need to get broken, probably including > third-party modules.
After looking more closely I see you didn't actually *remove* those macros, just define them in a different place/way. So the above objection is just noise, sorry. (Though I think it'd be notationally cleaner to let configure continue to define the macros; it doesn't need to do anything as ugly as CppAsString2() to concatenate...) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers