On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> With apologies to our beloved commitfest-mace-wielding CFM, commitfest >> 2013-11 intentionally still contains a few open patches. I think that >> CF is largely being ignored by most people now that we have CF 2014-01 >> in progress. If we don't want to do anything about these patches in the >> immediate future, I propose we move them to CF 2014-01. > > I think the idea was that patch authors should take responsibility for > pushing their patches forward to 2014-01 if they still wanted them > considered. Quite a few patches already were moved that way, IIRC.
Agreed on that general theory. And, also, yeah, the shared memory message queueing stuff got committed. Sorry, I missed the fact that there was still an open CF entry for that; I assumed that it would have been marked Returned with Feedback. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
