Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > So clearly there is an overflow somewhere in the calculation of > effective_cache_size, most likely from the fact that it's now dynamically > calculated.
Yeah. Fixed.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
