On 01/29/2014 12:46 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> I think the opening paragraphs contrasting json/jsonb be needs
> refinement.  json is going to be slightly faster than jsonb for input
> *and* output.  For example, in one application I store fairly large
> json objects containing pre-compiled static polygon data that is
> simply flipped up to google maps.  This case will likely be pessimal
> for jsonb.  For the next paragaph, I'd like to expand it a bit on
> 'specialized needs' and boil it down to specific uses cases.
> Basically, json will likely be more compact in most cases and slightly
> faster for input/output;  jsonb would be preferred in any context
> where processing, or searching or extensive server side parsing is
> employed.
> 
> If you agree, I'd be happy to do that...

Please take a stab at it, I'll be happy to revise it.

I was working on doing a two-column table comparison chart; I still
think that's the best way to go.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to