On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 09:12:03AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> > wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > >> So do we want to keep that "AND" in the 9.3beta and 9.4 documentation? > > > > The grammar as in gram.y still allows the AND form, and I think we're > > used to maintain documentation that matches the code here. So I think it > > makes sense to remove both capabilities as we failed to deliver any > > other filter. > > > > But if we wanted to clean that, what about having the grammar check for > > the only one item we support rather than waiting until into > > CreateEventTrigger() to ereport a syntax error? > > I have found that it's generally better to recognize such errors in > the post-parse phase rather than during parsing. When you start > adding more options, that tends to quickly become the only workable > option anyway.
OK, so I am assuming there is no additional work to do this area. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
