On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > So we consider the > appropriateness of a regular strcoll() or a strxfrm() in all contexts > (in a generic and extensible manner, but that's essentially what we > do). I'm not too discouraged by this restriction, because in practice > it won't come up very often.
I meant: We consider the appropriateness of a strxfrm() + strcmp() against the pre-strfxfrm()'d scanKey datum, when the optimization is not in force, as against just a plain strcmp() when it is. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
