On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:30:41PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >> > Sure. To be honest, when I received the same request from Andres, >> > I did that benchmark. But unfortunately because of machine trouble, >> > I could not report it, yet. Will do that again. >> >> Here is the benchmark result: >> >> * Result >> [tps] >> 1317.306391 (full_page_writes = on) >> 1628.407752 (compress) >> >> [the amount of WAL generated during running pgbench] >> 1319 MB (on) >> 326 MB (compress) >> >> [time required to replay WAL generated during running pgbench] >> 19s (on) >> 2013-10-11 12:05:09 JST LOG: redo starts at F/F1000028 >> 2013-10-11 12:05:28 JST LOG: redo done at 10/446B7BF0 >> >> 12s (on) >> 2013-10-11 12:06:22 JST LOG: redo starts at F/F1000028 >> 2013-10-11 12:06:34 JST LOG: redo done at 10/446B7BF0 >> >> 12s (on) >> 2013-10-11 12:07:19 JST LOG: redo starts at F/F1000028 >> 2013-10-11 12:07:31 JST LOG: redo done at 10/446B7BF0 >> >> 8s (compress) >> 2013-10-11 12:17:36 JST LOG: redo starts at 10/50000028 >> 2013-10-11 12:17:44 JST LOG: redo done at 10/655AE478 >> >> 8s (compress) >> 2013-10-11 12:18:26 JST LOG: redo starts at 10/50000028 >> 2013-10-11 12:18:34 JST LOG: redo done at 10/655AE478 >> >> 8s (compress) >> 2013-10-11 12:19:07 JST LOG: redo starts at 10/50000028 >> 2013-10-11 12:19:15 JST LOG: redo done at 10/655AE478 > > Fujii, are you still working on this? I sure hope so.
Yes, but it's too late to implement and post new patch in this development cycle of 9.4dev. I will propose that in next CF. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers