On 2014-02-01 20:03:58 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I think we should give serious consideration to desupporting this > combination so that we can get rid of the plague of PGDLLIMPORT > marks. Obviously this would depend on confirming that there are > no more-interesting Windows build methods that require it --- but > if there are any, I'd sure demand that there be an active buildfarm > instance to keep us from breaking the case again in future.
Weren't there more recent cases of needing to add PGDLLIMPORTs? I certainly remember pushing code to Craig's jenkins instance which made me do so for recent msvc builds... E.g. 7d7eee8bb702d7796a0d7c5886c1f4685f2e2806 and 708c529c7fdeba9387825d746752fc6f439d781e just a few days ago seems to be some of those cases. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
