Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> That reminds me, not that I directly see how it could be responsible,
> there's still 20131029011623.gj20...@awork2.anarazel.de ff. around. I
> don't think we came to a agreement in that thread how to fix the
> problem.
Hm, yeah. I'm not sure I believe Heikki's argument that we need to avoid
closing the smgr relation. If that stuff is being used in any
performance-critical paths then we've got trouble already.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
