Greg Copeland wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > I see. I just always assumed that it would be done as part of table > space effort as it's such a defacto feature. > > I am curious as to why no one has commented on the other rather obvious > performance enhancement which was brought up in this thread. Allowing > for parallel sorting seems rather obvious and is a common enhancement > yet seems to of been completely dismissed as people seem to be fixated > on I/O. Go figure.
We think we are fixated on I/O because we think that is where the delay is. Is there a reason we shouldn't think that? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
