On 2014-02-12 21:23:54 +0900, MauMau wrote: > Maybe we could consider in that direction, but there is a problem. Archive > recovery slows down compared to 9.1, because of repeated restartpoints. > Archive recovery should be as fast as possible, because it typically applies > dozens or hundreds of WAL files, and the DBA desires immediate resumption of > operation. > > So, I think we should restore 9.1 behavior for archive recovery.
It's easy to be fast, if it's not correct. I don't see how that behaviour is acceptable, imo the previous behaviour simply was a bug whose fix was too invasive to backpatch. I don't think you can convince me (but maybe others) that the old behaviour is acceptable. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
