Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On February 12, 2014 10:23:21 PM CET, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net>
> wrote:
>> There are cases where one module needs symbols from another directly.
>> Would that be affected by this?
> I don't think we have real infrastructure for that yet. Neither from the POV
> of loading several .so's, nor from a symbol visibility. Afaics we'd need a
> working definition of PGDLLIMPORT which inverts the declspecs. I think Tom
> just removed the remnants of that.
No, I've not touched the PGDLLIMPORT macros. I was hoping to, but it
looks like we're not getting there :-(
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
